人命被賤待,誰之過?  

3 mins read

香港致命工傷意外頻生,令人慘不忍睹,現時職安健違例罰則輕微,法庭往往對違例僱主罰款二、三萬元了事,人命被賤待,一直為人垢病。

雖說立法會已在審議政府提高罰則的修例建議,但翻查資料顯示,早於2017年施政報告已宣佈檢討職安健條例罰則,何解拖至五年後才交立法會審議,關乎人命的法案竟是如此姍姍來遲?

職安健條例罰則逾廿年未曾修訂

現行職安健條例的罰則已逾20年未作修訂,2017年施政報告提出檢討後,待至2019年勞工處才首次提出修例建議,將最高刑罰由30萬元增加至300萬元,最高監禁期則由6個月增至兩年。更重要是,針對嚴重違規個案,建議引入「可公訴罰則」,最高罰款為營業額一成或600萬元(以高者為準),最高監禁刑期則為3年。

商界阻引「與營業額掛鉤罰則」

最高罰則以營業額一定比例掛鉤,意思就是不設金額上限,企業規模愈大罰款愈高,這對於一向無視罰款的大財團來說,能起實質阻嚇作用;而且,按企業規模罰款有所不同的做法,亦可堵塞以中小企承擔能力不足阻撓立法的口實。但建議卻遭商界反對,指法案對大企業「不公平」,政府高官見勢色不對隨即轉軚,收起原修例建議。2021年1月,政府再向立法會人力事務委員會提出新修訂,最高罰則改為以5000萬元為上限,針對違規大財團「營業額一成」的罰則規定卻是消失了。不過,縱使如此,財團仍然未肯收貨。

直至2022年2月,政府才提出現行交立法會審議的修例方案,將最高罰款由5000萬元再大幅下調至1000萬元。當然,相較二十年未作調整的原有罰款金額,政府大可說這已是大幅增加。但現實是,相對於每年營業額數以億元計的建造商來說,這罰款只是九牛一毛,可能他們賣一個單位也不只這價錢。如果罰則不是與營業額掛鉤,對於這些大企業來說,根本難有阻嚇作用。

政府高官天天口裡說「重視」,誇誇其談「工傷意外一宗都嫌多」,但行動卻是最誠實—-完全屈服於大財團利益。

修例拖延五年:89宗意外奪近百人命

更可悲的是,自2017年施政報告提出檢討職安健罰則,政府的修例建議反反覆覆不斷拖延,在這五年間,最少發生89宗致命工業意外,奪去了95條人命,如果政府能及早果斷修例嚴懲違例僱主,當中一些意外或可避免,對於失去摯親的家人來說,這是永遠無法彌補的遺憾和傷痛。

Who is to be held accountable for the fatal industrial accidents in Hong Kong? 

2 mins read

The city is still employing the same punishment framework since the 1990s

Fatal industrial accidents are all too common in Hong Kong. Yet the penalty for infractions of workplace safety and health are still fairly lenient. In most cases, employers are merely fined HKD 20,000 (USD 2,500) for a tragic workplace accident.

The Hong Kong Government announced its plan to review the current occupational safety and health (OSH) regulations back in 2017. However, it took the government five years to present the amendment bill in the city’s legislature, the Hong Kong Legislative Council (LegCo). Why did it take so long for the government to amend the regulations that impacts lives and deaths?

Regulations without revision for two decades

The two laws that regulate Hong Kong’s OSH have not been revised since 1994 and 1997. In Hong Kong Policy Address 2017, the Hong Kong government announced its plan to revise the law. Two years later, in 2019, the Hong Kong Labour Department proposed an amendment bill which would raise the maximum fine from HKD 300,000 to HKD 3,000,000, and increase the maximum imprisonment term from 6 months to 2 years.

Most importantly, the amendment bill proposed by the Labour Department could provoke the employers’ General Duties provisions to prosecute the duty holders, with the relevant maximum fine pitched at 10% of the convicted entities’ turnover or $6 million (whichever is the higher), and set the maximum imprisonment term at three years.

Objections from the business sector

This initial proposal matched the maximum fine to the convicted company’s turnover. In other words, there was no upper limit for the fine. The bigger the corporation, the higher the fine they would have to pay once convicted. This proposal answered concerns over whether small and medium-sized enterprises could afford the fine while making sure that the legal liability is strong enough to deter companies, especially those who consistently flout the law.

However, the initial proposal was met with strong opposition from the business sector arguing that the proposal was “unfair” to big corporations. The government thus made a U-turn and dropped this proposal. In 2021, the government drew up a new proposal capping the maximum penalty at HKD 50,000,000 and dropping the provision to match the fine to the company’s turnover. However, this amendment failed to gain the business sector’s support.

In February 2022, the Hong Kong government made the current proposal, dramatically lowering the maximum penalty by 80%, from HKD 50,000,000 to HKD 10,000,000. It would still be an improvement when compared with the current penalty, which was set under the standard two decades ago. However, when compared to the billions of annual revenue construction companies make, HKD 10,000,000 is a pittance. The reality is that construction companies wouldn’t be deterred by a penalty fine that would probably cost less than the apartment they are selling.

Action speaks louder than words. Whilst the government said they care about OSH and “one industrial tragedy is too many”, this amendment bill is the best evidence that the government put big corporate profit over workers’ life.

89 lives lost during the five years of delay

The sad truth is, since the government indicated its plan to review the OSH regulations in 2017, with all the delays in the past five years, there have been at least 89 fatal industrial accidents, taking 95 lives. These tragic losses could have been prevented if the government had amended the law and adopted stricter punishment. But nothing could ease the pain and loss of those families who are victims of the delays and ineffectiveness of these regulations.